Interference of the End: Why Recency Bias in Memory Determines When a Food Is Consumed Again
The results of three experiments reveal that memory for enjoyment of the end rather than the beginning of a gustatory experience determines how soon people desire to repeat that experience because memory for end moments, when one is most satiated, interferes with memory for initial moments.
Citation:
Carey Morewedge, Emily Garbinsky, and Baba Shiv (2014) ,"Interference of the End: Why Recency Bias in Memory Determines When a Food Is Consumed Again", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 141-145.
Authors
Carey Morewedge, Boston University, USA
Emily Garbinsky, Stanford University, USA
Baba Shiv, Stanford University, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Doing it the Hard Way: More Effortful Saving Leads to Less Investing
Joshua I Morris, Stanford University, USA
Szu-chi Huang, Stanford University, USA
Christopher Bechler, Stanford University, USA
Featured
Toward Optimal Symbolic Recovery: Why and When “Thank you” is Better than “Sorry” in Addressing Service Delays
Yanfen You, New Mexico State University, USA
Xiaojing Yang, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA
Lili Wang, Zhejiang University
Xiaoyan Deng, Ohio State University, USA
Featured
R5. Autonomy or Enjoyment? The Contingent Nature of Brand Ritual
Yaxuan Ran, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Echo Wen Wan, University of Hong Kong