Jimmy Choo Vs. Nike: Experienced Adaptation For Hedonic Vs. Utilitarian Products
Contrary to consumers’ lay belief that they adapt uniformly to hedonic and utilitarian products, we find that consumers who have experienced products show greater adaptation to hedonic compared to utilitarian products. This greater adaption has negative consequences for consumers by leading them to have greater regret for their hedonic purchases.
Citation:
Kelly Kiyeon Lee, Cynthia E. Cryder, and Stephen M. Nowlis (2014) ,"Jimmy Choo Vs. Nike: Experienced Adaptation For Hedonic Vs. Utilitarian Products", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 220-224.
Authors
Kelly Kiyeon Lee, Washington University in St. Louis, USA
Cynthia E. Cryder, Washington University in St. Louis, USA
Stephen M. Nowlis, Washington University in St. Louis, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
M8. Nostalgia Increases Healthy Attitudes and Behaviors
Jannine Lasaleta, Yeshiva University
Carolina O. C. Werle, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Amanda Pruski Yamim, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Featured
Compatibility Theory
Ioannis Evangelidis, Bocconi University, Italy
Stijn M. J. van Osselaer, Cornell University, USA
Featured
Contagion and Product Physicality A Study of Consumer Response to Recycled-Content Products
Qizhou Wang, University of Connecticut, USA
David Norton, University of Connecticut, USA
Robin A. Coulter, University of Connecticut, USA
William T. Ross, Jr., University of Connecticut, USA