The Motivating Force of Carrot Versus Stick Incentives on Prosocial Behavior

While “stick” incentives outperform “carrot” incentives in some domains due to loss aversion, we find the opposite pattern for incentives designed to motivate prosocial behavior. Seven studies demonstrate this effect and show that this effect is driven by the greater potential for carrot incentives to serve as self-signals of generosity.



Citation:

Alixandra Barasch and Deborah A. Small (2014) ,"The Motivating Force of Carrot Versus Stick Incentives on Prosocial Behavior", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 12-16.

Authors

Alixandra Barasch, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Deborah A. Small, University of Pennsylvania, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Consumer’s Local-Global Identity and Price-Quality Associations

Zhiyong Yang, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Sijie Sun, University of Texas at Arlington
Ashok K Lalwani, Indiana University, USA
Narayan Janakiraman, University of Texas at Arlington

Read More

Featured

Is Warm Always Trusting? The Effect of Seasonality on Trustworthiness

Gretchen Wilroy, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Margaret Meloy, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Simon Blanchard, Georgetown University, USA

Read More

Featured

How Passive Form Messages in CSR Advertisement Improve Consumer Reaction to the Campaign

Taehoon Park, University of South Carolina, USA
Anastasiya Pocheptsova Ghosh, University of Arizona, USA
Elise Chandon Ince, University of South Carolina, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.