Going to Extremes: Dialectical Thinking in the Context of Contradictory Information

Although dialectical thinking has been associated with modesty in consumer responses, we demonstrate that high (vs. low) dialectical thinking is associated with more extreme attitudes when these attitudes follow from processing contradictory information. This is because high dialectical thinkers process contradictory information fluently and have confidence in their own judgments.



Citation:

Yoshiko DeMotta, Mike Chen-ho Chao, and Thomas Kramer (2014) ,"Going to Extremes: Dialectical Thinking in the Context of Contradictory Information", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 454-454.

Authors

Yoshiko DeMotta, Fairleigh Dickinson University, USA
Mike Chen-ho Chao, William Paterson University, USA
Thomas Kramer, University of South Carolina, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Time-insensitive Budget Tracking: Nudging Consumers to Spread out Spending over Time

Liang Huang, University of Arizona, USA
Anastasiya Pocheptsova Ghosh, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Featured

N2. The Devil Wears FAKE Prada: Dual Envy Theory Explains Why Consumers Intend to Purchase Non-Deceptive Luxury Counterfeits

Tanvi Gupta, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Preeti Krishnan Lyndem, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Read More

Featured

Secret Consumption in Close Relationships

Kelley Gullo, Duke University, USA
Danielle J Brick, University of New Hampshire
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.