Going to Extremes: Dialectical Thinking in the Context of Contradictory Information

Although dialectical thinking has been associated with modesty in consumer responses, we demonstrate that high (vs. low) dialectical thinking is associated with more extreme attitudes when these attitudes follow from processing contradictory information. This is because high dialectical thinkers process contradictory information fluently and have confidence in their own judgments.


Yoshiko DeMotta, Mike Chen-ho Chao, and Thomas Kramer (2014) ,"Going to Extremes: Dialectical Thinking in the Context of Contradictory Information", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 454-454.


Yoshiko DeMotta, Fairleigh Dickinson University, USA
Mike Chen-ho Chao, William Paterson University, USA
Thomas Kramer, University of South Carolina, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Data-Driven Computational Brand Perception

Sudeep Bhatia, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Christopher Olivola, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Read More


F3. The Dark Side of Happy Brands: A Case Study of Newport Cigarette Advertising

Timothy Dewhirst, University of Guelph, Canada
Wonkyong Beth Lee, Western University, Canada

Read More


Financial Education and Confidence in Financial Knowledge

Stephen Atlas, University of Rhode Island
Nilton Porto, University of Rhode Island
Jing Jian Xiao, University of Rhode Island

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.