Known Unknowns in Judgment and Choice

In six studies we explore metacognitive knowledge in consumer judgment and choice. Differences in awareness of known unknowns is related to Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) scores and predicts biases such as overconfidence and the comparative ignorance effect. Consumers can be nudged to consider known unknowns for better judgments and decisions.



Citation:

Daniel Walters, Craig Fox, Philip M. Fernbach , and Steven Sloman (2013) ,"Known Unknowns in Judgment and Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .

Authors

Daniel Walters, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Craig Fox, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Philip M. Fernbach , University of Colorado, USA
Steven Sloman, Brown University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Growing Up Rich and Insecure Makes Objects Seem Human: Childhood Material and Social Environments Predict Anthropomorphism

Jodie Whelan, York University, Canada
Sean T. Hingston, York University, Canada
Matthew Thomson, Western University, Canada
Allison R. Johnson, Western University, Canada

Read More

Featured

Thanks for Nothing: Expressing Gratitude Invites Exploitation by Competitors

Kelly Kiyeon Lee, Georgetown University, USA
Jeremy A. Yip, Georgetown University, USA
Cindy Chan, University of Toronto, Canada
Alison Wood Brooks, Harvard Business School, USA

Read More

Featured

Can Implicit Theory Influence Construal Level?

Olya Bullard, University of Winnipeg
Sara Penner, University of Manitoba, Canada
Kelley Main, University of Manitoba, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.