Distinguishing Two Forms of Consumer Uncertainty

We show that consumers reliably distinguish epistemic (knowledge-based) uncertainty from aleatory (stochastic) uncertainty in their rating of events. These ratings predict evaluations of credit/blame and luckiness/unluckiness for good/bad outcomes and mediate hindsight bias. Moreover, consumers tend to make higher budget estimates concerning epistemic uncertainty, especially when they feel more knowledgeable.



Citation:

Gülden Ülkümen, David Tannenbaum , and Craig Fox (2013) ,"Distinguishing Two Forms of Consumer Uncertainty", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .

Authors

Gülden Ülkümen, University of Southern California, USA
David Tannenbaum , University of California Los Angeles, USA
Craig Fox , University of California Los Angeles, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

P14. Financial Behavior Among Young Adult Consumers: The Influence of Self-determination and Financial Psychology

Heejung Park, University of Wyoming, USA

Read More

Featured

K11. Effects of Emotional vs. Rational Thinking on Consumer Responses to Verbal Precision

Ann Kronrod, University of Massachusetts, USA
Guang-Xin Xie, University of Massachusetts Boston
Shai Danziger, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Read More

Featured

E6. The Effect of Crowding Perception on Helping Behavior ——Is Squeeze Warmer than Isolation?

Qingqing Guo, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.