Why Do You Think They Do That? Consumer Elaboration in the Detection of Manipulative Intent and Its Consequences on Product Judgments
The research explores the effectiveness of consumer elaboration of marketers’ manipulative intent. Three empirical studies demonstrate that educating consumers about a deception tactic is not sufficient. To detect unfair manipulative intent, consumers must engage System 2 processing by elaborating on why it is being used in a product claim.
Citation:
Robert Madrigal, Catherine Armstrong-Soule, and Leslie Koppenhafer (2013) ,"Why Do You Think They Do That? Consumer Elaboration in the Detection of Manipulative Intent and Its Consequences on Product Judgments", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .
Authors
Robert Madrigal, University of Oregon, USA
Catherine Armstrong-Soule, University of Oregon, USA
Leslie Koppenhafer, University of Oregon, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
The Role of Expectations About Changes in Wealth in Discounting Decisions
Abigail Sussman, University of Chicago, USA
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA
Shweta Desiraju, University of Chicago, USA
Featured
L11. Consumer Search Mode Produces Unintended Marketing Consequences
Dan King, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, USA
Sumitra Auschaitrakul, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce
Featured
“Million Dollar Smile?” How Smile Intensity, Relationship Norm and Consumer Self-Construal Influence Ad Effectiveness
Hsiao-Ching Lee, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
Chun-Tuan Chang, National Sun Yat-sen University
Yu-kang Lee, National Sun Yat-sen University
Hui-Wen Chang, National Sun Yat-sen University
Guei-hua Flora Huang, National Sun Yat-sen University