It “Feels” Good For Me: the Interaction of Naïve Theories and Processing Fluency in Subjective Evaluation of Healthiness
Little is known about the role of processing fluency in judgments of product healthiness. This research demonstrates that the effect of processing fluency is dependent upon consumers’ naïve health theories, underscoring the importance of matching such theories to the level of processing fluency most conducive to favorable product evaluations.
Citation:
Catherine Wiggins (2013) ,"It “Feels” Good For Me: the Interaction of Naïve Theories and Processing Fluency in Subjective Evaluation of Healthiness", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research.
Authors
Catherine Wiggins, Cornell University, USA
Volume
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Emotion, Scientific Reasoning, and Judgments of Scientific Evidence
Caitlin Drummond, University of Michigan, USA
Baruch Fischhoff, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Featured
Q12. Exploring Effects of Perceived Authenticity Of Instagram Models on Aad and Buying Intentions
Heather Shoenberger, University of Oregon, USA
Eunjin Kim, Southern Methodist University, USA
Featured
The Role of Expectations About Changes in Wealth in Discounting Decisions
Abigail Sussman, University of Chicago, USA
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA
Shweta Desiraju, University of Chicago, USA