Weak > Strong: the Ironic Effect of Argument Strength on Supportive Advocacy

When people seek support for a cause, they typically present the strongest arguments possible. The current research departs, however, in identifying the conditions under which (and processes through which) presenting weak arguments can motivate greater advocacy and action. Three experiments explore this effect and its parameters.


Omair Akhtar, David Paunesku, and Zakary L. Tormala (2013) ,"Weak > Strong: the Ironic Effect of Argument Strength on Supportive Advocacy", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .


Omair Akhtar, Stanford University, USA
David Paunesku, Stanford University, USA
Zakary L. Tormala, Stanford University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


When High-End Designers Partner With Low-Cost Retailers: Bridging the Access Gap

Gabriel E. Gonzales, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Johanna Slot, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Margaret Meloy, Pennsylvania State University, USA

Read More


Attribution of Authenticity: The Benefits of Self-Disclosure of Unfavorable Information

Li Jiang, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Maryam Kouchaki, Northeastern University, USA
Francesca Gino, Harvard Business School, USA

Read More


N7. Emotion Or Information? Effects Of Online Social Support On Customer Engagement

Chuang Wei, Tsinghua University
Maggie Wenjing Liu, Tsinghua University
Qichao Zhu, Tsinghua University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.