Giving to What We Want Instead of to What We Should

Despite participants’ widespread conviction that neediness is the most important consideration when allocating resources, we observe significant preference in actual allocations for appealing, relative to needy, causes. A self-enhancement motive underlies the preference for appealing causes: when donation options are separated from the self, the preference for appealing options disappears



Citation:

Cynthia Cryder, Simona Botti, and Yvetta Simonyan (2013) ,"Giving to What We Want Instead of to What We Should", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .

Authors

Cynthia Cryder, Washington University in St. Louis, USA
Simona Botti, London Business School, UK
Yvetta Simonyan, University of Birmingham, UK



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Compatibility Theory

Ioannis Evangelidis, Bocconi University, Italy
Stijn M. J. van Osselaer, Cornell University, USA

Read More

Featured

How Incremental Theory Enhances or Reduces Charitable Giving

Alyssa Yoon, Korea University, Korea
Jongwon Park, Korea University, Korea

Read More

Featured

Effects of Affective Language on Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews

Nikolay Georgiev, HEC Paris, France
Marc Vanhuele, HEC Paris, France

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.