The Cognitive and Behavioral Consequences of Considering Low-Fit Brand Extensions
We explore the cognitive consequences of evaluating brand extensions and find that evaluating low-fit extensions depletes consumers’ cognitive resources yet promotes more abstract processing. In support of our process, we find broadening one’s definition of “fit” moderates these effects. We conclude with a discussion of the implications for these findings.
Kelly Goldsmith and Ryan Hamilton (2013) ,"The Cognitive and Behavioral Consequences of Considering Low-Fit Brand Extensions", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .
Kelly Goldsmith, Northwestern University, USA
Ryan Hamilton, Emory University, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013
If No One Saw It on Instagram, Was It Any Good? Examining Received Attention as a Social Benefit of Experiential Consumption
Matthew J Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Jamie D. Hyodo, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
R12. Brand Primes Can Satiate (Important) Consumer Goals
Darlene Walsh, Concordia University, Canada
Chunxiang Huang, Concordia University, Canada
When Buffers Backfire: Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Consumer Response to Corporate Ethical Transgressions
Marlene Vock, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam
Adrian Ward, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Margaret C. Campbell, University of Colorado, USA