The Cognitive and Behavioral Consequences of Considering Low-Fit Brand Extensions

We explore the cognitive consequences of evaluating brand extensions and find that evaluating low-fit extensions depletes consumers’ cognitive resources yet promotes more abstract processing. In support of our process, we find broadening one’s definition of “fit” moderates these effects. We conclude with a discussion of the implications for these findings.


Kelly Goldsmith and Ryan Hamilton (2013) ,"The Cognitive and Behavioral Consequences of Considering Low-Fit Brand Extensions", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41, eds. Simona Botti and Aparna Labroo, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .


Kelly Goldsmith, Northwestern University, USA
Ryan Hamilton, Emory University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 41 | 2013

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


The Ex-Money Effect: When and Why People Feel Connected to Outcomes that Involve Money They Previously Had

Charis Li, University of Florida, USA
Yanping Tu, University of Florida, USA

Read More


The “Upper Limit Framing” Effect: Upper Limit Framing of a Cost Estimate Influences Consumption Choices

Sudipta Mukherjee, Virginia Tech, USA
Frank May, Virginia Tech, USA

Read More


When High-End Designers Partner With Low-Cost Retailers: Bridging the Access Gap

Gabriel E. Gonzales, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Johanna Slot, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Margaret Meloy, Pennsylvania State University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.