Consumer Attributional and Emotional Responses to Transgressions: Who’S to Blame?

Using the context of athlete transgressions in professional sport, this study explores the full effect of consumer response, not only toward the transgressor but also toward multiple associated actors within and outside a firm and the circumstances under which attribution of blame is extended to actors beyond the transgressor.



Citation:

Kate Westberg, Constantino Stavros, Bradley Wilson, and Aaron Smith (2013) ,"Consumer Attributional and Emotional Responses to Transgressions: Who’S to Blame?", in E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 10, eds. Gert Cornelissen, Elena Reutskaja, and Ana Valenzuela, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 261-262.

Authors

Kate Westberg, RMIT University, Australia
Constantino Stavros, RMIT University, Australia
Bradley Wilson, RMIT University, Australia
Aaron Smith, RMIT University, Australia



Volume

E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 10 | 2013



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Search Predicts and Changes Patience in Intertemporal Choice

Crystal Reeck, Temple University, USA
Lee Byung, Columbia University, USA
Eric J Johnson, Columbia University, USA

Read More

Featured

Burnishing Prosocial Image to Self vs. Others

Minah Jung, New York University, USA
Silvia Saccardo, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Ayelet Gneezy, University of California San Diego, USA
Leif D. Nelson, University of California Berkeley, USA

Read More

Featured

How Awe Might Be Awesome: The Role of Awe in Consumers’ Food Consumption and Perceptions of Misshapen Produce

Begum Oz, University of Massachusetts, USA
Elizabeth Miller, University of Massachusetts, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.