How Incidental Affect Alters Subsequent Judgments: Insights From a Human Fmri Study

Incidental affect prior to the consumption influences the evaluation of the consumed good, but the processes subserving this incidental reward effect is not well understood. We find that behavioral responses support “affect-as-information” theories, but the neural data find evidence for an affect regulation hypothesis.



Citation:

Hilke Plassmann, Beth Pavlicek, and Baba Shiv (2012) ,"How Incidental Affect Alters Subsequent Judgments: Insights From a Human Fmri Study", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 158-162.

Authors

Hilke Plassmann, INSEAD, France
Beth Pavlicek, Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris, France
Baba Shiv, Stanford University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

R12. Brand Primes Can Satiate (Important) Consumer Goals

Darlene Walsh, Concordia University, Canada
Chunxiang Huang, Concordia University, Canada

Read More

Featured

Ecce Machina Humana: Examining Competence and Warmth in Consumer Robots The two fundamental social judgment dimensions-competence and warmth-are as relevant for judging consumer robots as for humans. We find that competence has an increasing positive eff

Read More

Featured

Nostalgiacising: A Performative Theory of Nostalgic Consumption

Ela Veresiu, York University, Canada
Ana Babic Rosario, University of Denver
Thomas Derek Robinson, City University of London, UK

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.