How Incidental Affect Alters Subsequent Judgments: Insights From a Human Fmri Study

Incidental affect prior to the consumption influences the evaluation of the consumed good, but the processes subserving this incidental reward effect is not well understood. We find that behavioral responses support “affect-as-information” theories, but the neural data find evidence for an affect regulation hypothesis.



Citation:

Hilke Plassmann, Beth Pavlicek, and Baba Shiv (2012) ,"How Incidental Affect Alters Subsequent Judgments: Insights From a Human Fmri Study", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 158-162.

Authors

Hilke Plassmann, INSEAD, France
Beth Pavlicek, Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris, France
Baba Shiv, Stanford University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Both Good from Afar…and Far from Good? Mental Representation Changes Consumer Preference for Products from a Brand with a Reputation for Innovativeness

Jeff Larson, Brigham Young University, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA
BJ Allen, University of Arkansas, USA

Read More

Featured

M8. Nostalgia Increases Healthy Attitudes and Behaviors

Jannine Lasaleta, Yeshiva University
Carolina O. C. Werle, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Amanda Pruski Yamim, Grenoble Ecole de Management

Read More

Featured

When the Ends Do Not Justify Paying for the Means: Consumers Prefer Shifting Costs from Means to Goals

Franklin Shaddy, University of Chicago, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.