To Trade Or Not?: Removing Trading Motivation Eliminates the Endowment Effect

The current work suggests that owner/non-owner discrepancies can exist because consumers are typically required to specify prices at which they would trade. Consequently, we predict that owners/non-owners likely set prices sufficiently above/below perceived worth to motivate trade. When ownership and trading are separated we find that the endowment effect disappears.



Citation:

Laurence Ashworth, Lindsay McShane, and Tiffany Vu (2012) ,"To Trade Or Not?: Removing Trading Motivation Eliminates the Endowment Effect", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1128-1128.

Authors

Laurence Ashworth, Queens University, Canada
Lindsay McShane, Queens University, Canada
Tiffany Vu, Queens University, Canada



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Taking a Leaf out of my Review: The Asymmetrical Link between Linguistic Similarity and Attitude Certainty for Writers and Readers of Product Reviews

Ann Kronrod, University of Massachusetts, USA
Yakov Bart, Northeastern University, USA

Read More

Featured

The Upside of Incompetence: How Discounting Luxury Affects Retailer Price Image

Karen Wallach, Emory University, USA
Ryan Hamilton, Emory University, USA
morgan k ward, Emory University, USA

Read More

Featured

Doing Worse by Doing Good: How Corporate Social Responsibility makes Products Less Dangerous

Linda Lemarié, University of Neuchâtel
Florent Girardin, University of Neuchâtel

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.