Why Are Benefits Left on the Table? Assessing the Role of Information, Complexity, and Stigma on Take-Up With an Irs Field Experiment

We address the puzzle of incomplete EITC take-up with a field experiment testing the role of information, complexity, and stigma among 35,050 individuals owed benefits of $26 million. We find that simplicity and display of benefits significantly increases take-up, and our interventions could reduce incomplete program take-up from 25% to 22%.



Citation:

Saurabh Bhargava and Day Manoli (2012) ,"Why Are Benefits Left on the Table? Assessing the Role of Information, Complexity, and Stigma on Take-Up With an Irs Field Experiment", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 298-302.

Authors

Saurabh Bhargava, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Day Manoli, University of California Los Angeles, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Green Biases: Consumer Evaluations of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Sources

Nathan Dhaliwal, University of British Columbia, Canada
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Jiaying Zhang, University of British Columbia, Canada

Read More

Featured

Attribution of Authenticity: The Benefits of Self-Disclosure of Unfavorable Information

Li Jiang, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Maryam Kouchaki, Northeastern University, USA
Francesca Gino, Harvard Business School, USA

Read More

Featured

Q13. Liquid Consumption From Another Perspective: The Case of “Investomers”

Carina Hoffmann, Heinrich-Heine-University
Lasse Meißner, Heinrich-Heine-University
Peter Kenning, Heinrich-Heine-University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.