Estimating Central Tendencies: Dead Reckoning Vs. Decomposition

Judgments regarding aggregate quantities or group means – such as the number of pieces of sushi needed for a party can “dead reckoned” or imputed by eliciting by subsidiary judgments (e.g., How many people will come?; How many pieces will the typical person eat?) I show that decomposition often reduces bias.



Citation:

Shane Frederick (2012) ,"Estimating Central Tendencies: Dead Reckoning Vs. Decomposition", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 271-275.

Authors

Shane Frederick, Yale University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

B3. The Effect of Temporal Distance on Online Reviews’ Recommendation Power: The Role of Spontaneous Retrieval and Perceived Trust

Kyu Ree Kim, Seoul National University
Wujin Chu, Seoul National University

Read More

Featured

C9. Filling the Expectations: How Packaging Sustainability Influences Consumers' Inference of Product Attributes

Olga Lavrusheva, Aalto University, Finland
Alexei Gloukhovtsev, Aalto University, Finland
Kristina Wittkowski, Aalto University, Finland
Tomas Falk, Aalto University, Finland
Pekka Mattila, Aalto University, Finland

Read More

Featured

The Psychology of Fun: Inquiry into Consumers' Fun Experiences

Travis Tae Oh, Columbia University, USA
Michel Tuan Pham, Columbia University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.