When Two Is Better Than One: Polarization and Compromise in Unrestricted Choice

When faced with decision conflict, consumers often choose compromise options. However, we show that this occurs when purchase quantity is restricted to a single option, whereas, when purchase quantity is not restricted, consumers may opt to resolve decision conflict by choosing multiple extreme options.



Citation:

Andrea Bonezzi, Alexander Chernev, and Aaron Brough (2012) ,"When Two Is Better Than One: Polarization and Compromise in Unrestricted Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 266-270.

Authors

Andrea Bonezzi, New York University, USA
Alexander Chernev, Northwestern University, USA
Aaron Brough, Pepperdine University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

How Do Consumers React to Anthropomorphized Brand Alliance? Applying Interpersonal Expectations to Business-to-Business Relationships

DONGJIN HE, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Fangyuan Chen, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Yuwei Jiang, Hong Kong Polytechic University

Read More

Featured

A Rational Model to Predict Consumers’ Irrational Behavior

Vahid Rahmani, Rowan University

Read More

Featured

Vicarious Pride: When Gift Customization Increases Recipients’ Appreciation of the Gift

Marta Pizzetti, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Michael Gibbert, Università della Svizzera Italiana

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.