When Two Is Better Than One: Polarization and Compromise in Unrestricted Choice
When faced with decision conflict, consumers often choose compromise options. However, we show that this occurs when purchase quantity is restricted to a single option, whereas, when purchase quantity is not restricted, consumers may opt to resolve decision conflict by choosing multiple extreme options.
Andrea Bonezzi, Alexander Chernev, and Aaron Brough (2012) ,"When Two Is Better Than One: Polarization and Compromise in Unrestricted Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 266-270.
Andrea Bonezzi, New York University, USA
Alexander Chernev, Northwestern University, USA
Aaron Brough, Pepperdine University, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012
How Do Consumers React to Anthropomorphized Brand Alliance? Applying Interpersonal Expectations to Business-to-Business Relationships
DONGJIN HE, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Fangyuan Chen, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Yuwei Jiang, Hong Kong Polytechic University
A Rational Model to Predict Consumers’ Irrational Behavior
Vahid Rahmani, Rowan University
Vicarious Pride: When Gift Customization Increases Recipients’ Appreciation of the Gift
Marta Pizzetti, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Michael Gibbert, Università della Svizzera Italiana