Vice Versus Virtue: How Compromise Phantom Alternatives Can Increase Indulgence

The current study proposes that a compromise-but-unavailable "phantom" alternative can increase indulgence in vices. Three experiments examine this effect as well as the mediating roles of anticipatory guilt/regret and the moderating role of preference strength.



Citation:

Yuanyuan Liu, Timothy B. Heath, and Ayse Önçüler (2012) ,"Vice Versus Virtue: How Compromise Phantom Alternatives Can Increase Indulgence", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1128-1128.

Authors

Yuanyuan Liu, ESSEC Business School, France
Timothy B. Heath, HEC Paris, France
Ayse Önçüler, ESSEC Business school, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

G11. Sensory Placebo Effects: The Role of Sensory Signaling in Enhancing Marketing Placebos and Consumer Outcomes

Dan King, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, USA
Sumitra Auschaitrakul, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce

Read More

Featured

L7. The Joy of Shopping: Reconciling Mixed Effects of Positive Emotions on Shopping Behavior

Kelley Gullo, Duke University, USA
Duncan Simester, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA

Read More

Featured

My Experience or My Expectations: The Effect of Expectations as Reference Points on Willingness to Recommend Experiential Purchases

Stephanie Tully, University of Southern California, USA
Amar Cheema, University of Virginia, USA
On Amir, University of California San Diego, USA
Davide Proserpio, University of Southern California, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.