Good Or Bad, We Want It Now: Resolution Theory Explains Magnitude Reversal in Intertemporal Choice

Across four studies, outcome magnitude has opposite effects on intertemporal choice for gains and losses: consumers discount small gains more than large gains, but discount small losses less than large losses. Thought listings show that this is mediated by consumers' desire to resolve gains and losses as soon as possible.



Citation:

David Hardisty, Kirstin Appelt, and Elke Weber (2012) ,"Good Or Bad, We Want It Now: Resolution Theory Explains Magnitude Reversal in Intertemporal Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 991-992.

Authors

David Hardisty, Stanford University, USA
Kirstin Appelt, Columbia University, USA
Elke Weber, Columbia University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Identity Threats, Compensatory Consumption and Working Memory Capacity: When and Why Feeling Threatened Leads to Heightened Evaluations of Identity-Relevant Products

Read More

Featured

Tuition Myopia: Temporal Discounting Induces a Myopic Focus on the Costs of Higher Education

Haewon Yoon, Indiana University, USA
Yang Yang, University of Florida, USA
Carey K. Morewedge, Boston University, USA

Read More

Featured

Financial Education and Confidence in Financial Knowledge

Stephen Atlas, University of Rhode Island
Nilton Porto, University of Rhode Island
Jing Jian Xiao, University of Rhode Island

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.