Whom to Trust? the Impact of Peer Vs. Expert Opinions on Consumption Experiences
We demonstrate the differential impact of peer versus expert reviews on pre-purchase attitudes and post-purchase consumption experience. We show that consumers use experts’ opinions to a greater extent than peers’, such that attitude change following a consumption experience is greater when consumers read peer (vs. expert) reviews.
Travis Hancock and Ryan Elder (2012) ,"Whom to Trust? the Impact of Peer Vs. Expert Opinions on Consumption Experiences", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1117-1117.
Travis Hancock, Brigham Young University, USA
Ryan Elder, Brigham Young University, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012
Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments
Romain Cadario, IESEG School of Management
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France
Visualizing Price Magnitude: How Slider Scales Change Willingness-to-Pay
Manoj Thomas, Cornell University, USA
Ellie Kyung, Dartmouth College, USA
Anticipated Interpersonal Feedback Reshapes Other-oriented Intertemporal Choices
Adelle Xue Yang, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA