Do Higher Stakes Lead to Better Choices?

Highly involved decision-makers often rely on anecdotal evidence instead of statistical information, because visceral information is favored in vivid decision contexts. We demonstrate that, under high vulnerability, this anecdotal bias is: (1) enhanced by high involvement; (2) mediated by emotional engagement; and, (3) stronger among holistic versus analytic thinkers.



Citation:

Freling Traci, Saini Ritesh, and Yang Zhiyong (2012) ,"Do Higher Stakes Lead to Better Choices?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 926-927.

Authors

Freling Traci, University of Texas - Arlington, USA
Saini Ritesh, University of Texas - Arlington, USA
Yang Zhiyong, University of Texas - Arlington, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Running Through Time: How Life Rhythms Foster Identity Permanence

Benjamin Rosenthal, Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Read More

Featured

Show Me More! Powerlessness Drives Variety Seeking

Wangshuai Wang, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
Raj Raghunathan, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Dinesh Gauri, University of Arkansas, USA

Read More

Featured

How Do Consumers React to Anthropomorphized Brand Alliance? Applying Interpersonal Expectations to Business-to-Business Relationships

DONGJIN HE, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Fangyuan Chen, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Yuwei Jiang, Hong Kong Polytechic University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.