Do Higher Stakes Lead to Better Choices?
Highly involved decision-makers often rely on anecdotal evidence instead of statistical information, because visceral information is favored in vivid decision contexts. We demonstrate that, under high vulnerability, this anecdotal bias is: (1) enhanced by high involvement; (2) mediated by emotional engagement; and, (3) stronger among holistic versus analytic thinkers.
Freling Traci, Saini Ritesh, and Yang Zhiyong (2012) ,"Do Higher Stakes Lead to Better Choices?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 926-927.
Freling Traci, University of Texas - Arlington, USA
Saini Ritesh, University of Texas - Arlington, USA
Yang Zhiyong, University of Texas - Arlington, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012
Running Through Time: How Life Rhythms Foster Identity Permanence
Benjamin Rosenthal, Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Show Me More! Powerlessness Drives Variety Seeking
Wangshuai Wang, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
Raj Raghunathan, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Dinesh Gauri, University of Arkansas, USA
How Do Consumers React to Anthropomorphized Brand Alliance? Applying Interpersonal Expectations to Business-to-Business Relationships
DONGJIN HE, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Fangyuan Chen, Hong Kong Polytechic University
Yuwei Jiang, Hong Kong Polytechic University