To Think Or Not to Think: the Pros and Cons of Thought Suppression

We investigate why suppressing thoughts about a failure results in poor consumption decisions. Although both mechanisms required for thought suppression have been shown to affect consumption, we demonstrate that it is finding distracting thoughts, not the monitoring process, which depletes self-regulatory resources. This means the depleting effect can be managed.



Citation:

Natalina Zlatevska and Elizabeth Cowley (2012) ,"To Think Or Not to Think: the Pros and Cons of Thought Suppression", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 837-838.

Authors

Natalina Zlatevska, Bond University, Australia
Elizabeth Cowley, University of Sydney, Australia



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

A7. Credible Critters: Source and Message Expectancy Violation and Influence on Perceived Trustworthiness and Credibility

Justin Graeber, University of Texas at Austin, USA

Read More

Featured

D8. Why Employees Communicate Positive eWOM on Social Networking Sites: Motivations and Moderators

Jing Zhang, 华中科技大学管理学院
Ya Zhang, 华中科技大学管理学院

Read More

Featured

When High-End Designers Partner With Low-Cost Retailers: Bridging the Access Gap

Gabriel E. Gonzales, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Johanna Slot, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Margaret Meloy, Pennsylvania State University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.