Navigating the Waters: Regulating Versus Using Feelings Toward Risky Choices

Do happy or sad people take more risks? In three experiments, we find that happy people who regulate (use) their feelings are risk-averse (risk-seeking); meanwhile, sad people who regulate (use) their feelings are risk-seeking (risk-averse). This distinction between affect-regulation and affect-as-input reconciles past research and makes predictions regarding consumers' incidental feelings and their risk preferences.



Citation:

Eugene Y. Chan and Najam U. Saqib (2012) ,"Navigating the Waters: Regulating Versus Using Feelings Toward Risky Choices", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 813-814.

Authors

Eugene Y. Chan, University of Toronto, Canada
Najam U. Saqib, Qatar University, Qatar



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Exiting Etsy? When Collaboration Among Market Co-Creators Come Undone

daiane scaraboto, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Eileen Fischer, York University, Canada

Read More

Featured

Let's Get Together and Make a Difference: Experiencing a Community in Donation-Based Crowdfunding

Danit Ein-Gar, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Read More

Featured

Shared Values, Trust, and Consumers’ Deference to Experts

Samuel Johnson, University of Bath, UK
Max Rodrigues, DePaul University, USA
David Tuckett, University College London

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.