Data Collection in a Flat World: Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples
We compare Mechanical Turk participants to community and student samples on personality, financial, and consumption dimensions, as well as classic decision-making biases. We find many similarities between Mechanical Turk participants and traditional samples, but we also find important differences that researchers should consider when using Mechanical Turk for consumer research.
Joseph K. Goodman, Cynthia E. Cryder, and Amar Cheema (2012) ,"Data Collection in a Flat World: Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 112-116.
Joseph K. Goodman, Washington University in St.Louis, USA
Cynthia E. Cryder, Washington University in St.Louis, USA
Amar Cheema, University of Virginia, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012
That's Just Plain Creepy: Understanding Consumer Responses to Personalized Food Products That Resemble People
Freeman Wu, Vanderbilt University, USA
Adriana Samper, Arizona State University, USA
Andrea Morales, Arizona State University, USA
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA
“It’s Not You, It’s Me”: How Corporate Social Responsibility Decreases Customer Citizenship Behavior
Sofia Batista Ferraz, EAESP-FGV
Andres Rodriguez Veloso, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Diogo Hildebrand, Baruch College, USA
H12. Does Economic Development Influence Consumer Innovativeness?
Fuchun Zhan, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Nancy Wong, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Julie Anne Lee, University of Western Australia