Data Collection in a Flat World: Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples

We compare Mechanical Turk participants to community and student samples on personality, financial, and consumption dimensions, as well as classic decision-making biases. We find many similarities between Mechanical Turk participants and traditional samples, but we also find important differences that researchers should consider when using Mechanical Turk for consumer research.



Citation:

Joseph K. Goodman, Cynthia E. Cryder, and Amar Cheema (2012) ,"Data Collection in a Flat World: Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 112-116.

Authors

Joseph K. Goodman, Washington University in St.Louis, USA
Cynthia E. Cryder, Washington University in St.Louis, USA
Amar Cheema, University of Virginia, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

That's Just Plain Creepy: Understanding Consumer Responses to Personalized Food Products That Resemble People

Freeman Wu, Vanderbilt University, USA
Adriana Samper, Arizona State University, USA
Andrea Morales, Arizona State University, USA
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA

Read More

Featured

“It’s Not You, It’s Me”: How Corporate Social Responsibility Decreases Customer Citizenship Behavior

Sofia Batista Ferraz, EAESP-FGV
Andres Rodriguez Veloso, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Diogo Hildebrand, Baruch College, USA

Read More

Featured

H12. Does Economic Development Influence Consumer Innovativeness?

Fuchun Zhan, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Nancy Wong, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Julie Anne Lee, University of Western Australia

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.