The Genetic Contribution to Preference Consistency in Moral Judgments

We demonstrate that variation in the consistency of moral judgments is heritable. Moreover, we do not find evidence for a shared genetic architecture between consistency in moral judgments and sex, religiosity, or cognitive reflection – factors, which have been shown to influence the general tendency for utilitarian versus deontological considerations.



Citation:

Nina Mazar , Christopher Dawes , Peter Loewen, David Cesarini , Magnus Johannesson , and Patrik Magnusson (2012) ,"The Genetic Contribution to Preference Consistency in Moral Judgments ", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40, eds. Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, Cele Otnes, and Rui (Juliet) Zhu, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 22-27.

Authors

Nina Mazar , University of Toronto, Canada
Christopher Dawes , New York University
Peter Loewen, University of Toronto, Canada
David Cesarini , New York University, USA
Magnus Johannesson , Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
Patrik Magnusson , Karolinska Institutet, Sweden



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 40 | 2012



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Accounting For Gains From Discounted Credit

Andong Cheng, University of Delaware, USA
Ernest Baskin, Yale University, USA

Read More

Featured

P5. Can(Can’t) Control, thus Try to Save (Earn): The Joint Effect of Perceived Control and Financial Deprivation on Financial Decisions

Min Jung Kim, Manhattan College

Read More

Featured

Machine Talk: How Conversational Chatbots Promote Brand Intimacy and Influence Consumer Choice

Thomas Hilden, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Christian Hildebrand, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Gerald Häubl, University of Alberta, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.