Price Comparisons As Information About Personal Competence and Relational Value: the Influence on Perceived Fairness
As companies increasingly adopt dynamic pricing policies, it is not uncommon for consumers to pay different prices for the same product. Fairness research indicates that not all of these price discrepancies are equally unfair. We argue that one of the reasons that certain price discrepancies may be considered particularly unfair is because they threaten important aspects of consumers’ self-concept. Specifically, to the extent that a price inequity conveys threatening information about consumers’ competence and/or relational value, we expect the consumer to perceive the situation as more unfair. We find support for the exacerbating effects of both threats to personal competence and threats to relational value on perceived (un)fairness.
Lindsay McShane and Laurence Ashworth (2011) ,"Price Comparisons As Information About Personal Competence and Relational Value: the Influence on Perceived Fairness", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39, eds. Rohini Ahluwalia, Tanya L. Chartrand, and Rebecca K. Ratner, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 841-842.
Lindsay McShane, Queens University, Canada
Laurence Ashworth, Queens University, Canada
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39 | 2011
The Role of Expectations About Changes in Wealth in Discounting Decisions
Abigail Sussman, University of Chicago, USA
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA
Shweta Desiraju, University of Chicago, USA
J8. Exchange with The Rich, Concern with The Poor: The Effects of Social Class on Consumer Response to Brand Relationship
Bing Han, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Liangyan Wang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Q3. Academic Branding on Social Media: Examining the Influence of Personal Brands on the Professor-Student Relationships
Edita Petrylaite, Northumbria University, UK
Darija Aleksic, University of Ljubljana