The Two-Sided Mirror: How Correcting For Diagnosticity Impacts Social Comparisons With Advertisement Models

This research explores the role of a diagnostic comparison standard in women’s assessments of their own attractiveness when exposed to ads featuring idealized models versus everyday people. We find that women rate themselves as being less attractive after seeing advertisements featuring idealized models but rate themselves as being more attractive after exposure to advertisements featuring more realistic images of everyday women. We then reverse this effect and suggest that it is moderated through assessments of diagnosticity for social comparison.



Citation:

Abigail Schneider and Susan Jung Grant (2011) ,"The Two-Sided Mirror: How Correcting For Diagnosticity Impacts Social Comparisons With Advertisement Models", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39, eds. Rohini Ahluwalia, Tanya L. Chartrand, and Rebecca K. Ratner, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 838-839.

Authors

Abigail Schneider, University of Colorado, USA
Susan Jung Grant, University of Colorado, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

How Numeric Roundness Influences Probability Perceptions

Julio Sevilla, University of Georgia, USA
Rajesh Bagchi, Virginia Tech, USA

Read More

Featured

Trust, but Verify: A Multi-level Examination of Online Reviews and Persuasion Knowledge

Martin A. Pyle, Ryerson University
Andrew Smith, Suffolk University
Yanina Chevtchouk, University of Glasgow

Read More

Featured

So-Bad-It’s-Good: When Consumers Prefer Bad Options

Evan Weingarten, University of California San Diego, USA
Amit Bhattacharjee, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Patti Williams, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.