How Best to Think About the Future: Which Outcome Elaboration Strategies Help Control Desire?
We seek to examine how different ways of construing potential future outcomes of one’s current decisions through varying their valence and level of abstraction can serve to enhance or dampen one’s self-control. Results show that different combinations of construing potential outcomes are beneficial for controlling desires.
Gergana Nenkov, Kelly Haws, and Min Jung Kim (2011) ,"How Best to Think About the Future: Which Outcome Elaboration Strategies Help Control Desire? ", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39, eds. Rohini Ahluwalia, Tanya L. Chartrand, and Rebecca K. Ratner, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 40-41.
Gergana Nenkov, Boston College, USA
Kelly Haws, Texas A&M University, USA
Min Jung Kim, Texas A&M University, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39 | 2011
To Trace is to Trust: From Product Traceability to Brand Trust
Jing Wan, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Pankaj Aggarwal, University of Toronto, Canada
Min Zhao, Boston College, USA
E9. “Power Distance, Social Aspiration, and Fair Trade Products” – the Interaction Effect of Power Distance Belief and Status Motivation on Fair Trade Product Consumption
Sunghee Jun, Seoul National University
Libby Youngjin Chun, Seoul National University
Kiwan Park, Seoul National University, USA
Only "$20 More": Additional Price Framing Increases the Choice of Upgraded Products and Services
Thomas Allard, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Dale Griffin, University of British Columbia, Canada