How Best to Think About the Future: Which Outcome Elaboration Strategies Help Control Desire?

We seek to examine how different ways of construing potential future outcomes of one’s current decisions through varying their valence and level of abstraction can serve to enhance or dampen one’s self-control. Results show that different combinations of construing potential outcomes are beneficial for controlling desires.



Citation:

Gergana Nenkov, Kelly Haws, and Min Jung Kim (2011) ,"How Best to Think About the Future: Which Outcome Elaboration Strategies Help Control Desire? ", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39, eds. Rohini Ahluwalia, Tanya L. Chartrand, and Rebecca K. Ratner, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 40-41.

Authors

Gergana Nenkov, Boston College, USA
Kelly Haws, Texas A&M University, USA
Min Jung Kim, Texas A&M University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 39 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

To Trace is to Trust: From Product Traceability to Brand Trust

Jing Wan, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Pankaj Aggarwal, University of Toronto, Canada
Min Zhao, Boston College, USA

Read More

Featured

E9. “Power Distance, Social Aspiration, and Fair Trade Products” – the Interaction Effect of Power Distance Belief and Status Motivation on Fair Trade Product Consumption

Sunghee Jun, Seoul National University
Libby Youngjin Chun, Seoul National University
Kiwan Park, Seoul National University, USA

Read More

Featured

Only "$20 More": Additional Price Framing Increases the Choice of Upgraded Products and Services

Thomas Allard, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Dale Griffin, University of British Columbia, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.