Maintenance Vs. Attainment Goals: Influence of Self-Regulation Goal Type on Size of Consideration Set and Preferred Temporal Dispersion of Goal Fulfilling Effort
Current research in goals has ignored maintenance (versus attainment) goals in which the current state coincides with or exceeds (versus lags) the desired state. Four studies with students and actual gym users show that maintainers prefer a temporally dispersed-effortfully less intense goal fulfilling strategy while attainers prefer a temporally concentrated-effortfully more intense strategy. Mediation analysis reveals this is because attainers hold stronger instrumentality bias, a belief that more intense effort will result in better reward. Also, maintainers, who focus on both process and outcomes of strategies, consider and use fewer goal fulfilling strategies than attainers, who focus more on strategies’ outcomes.
Citation:
Napatsorn Jiraporn and Kalpesh Kaushik Desai (2011) ,"Maintenance Vs. Attainment Goals: Influence of Self-Regulation Goal Type on Size of Consideration Set and Preferred Temporal Dispersion of Goal Fulfilling Effort ", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9, eds. Zhihong Yi, Jing Jian Xiao, and June Cotte and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .
Authors
Napatsorn Jiraporn, State University of New York at Binghamton/Oswego, USA
Kalpesh Kaushik Desai, State University of New York at Binghamton, USA
Volume
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9 | 2011
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
When High-End Designers Partner With Low-Cost Retailers: Bridging the Access Gap
Gabriel E. Gonzales, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Johanna Slot, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Margaret Meloy, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Featured
Preferences for Insight and Effort Differ across Domains and Audiences
Gaetano Nino Miceli, University of Calabria
Irene Scopelliti, City University of London, UK
Maria Antonietta Raimondo, University of Calabria
Featured
The Asymmetric Effect of Highlighting Intertemporal Opportunity Costs
Christopher Olivola, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Daniel Read, University of Warwick