Is “Gain” More Motivating Than “Loss” in Competition?
In this paper we examine the relative strengths of “gain” versus “loss” situations on motivation in a competitive context. Specifically, we compare the motivation after a “gain”, that is, gaining the tie status from an almost-loss situation, and after a loss, that is, being pulled equal from an almost-win situation in completion. Across 3 studies with field data, survey results, and lab experiments, we find that 1) people strongly believe that “gain” is more motivating than “loss”; 2) in terms of real motivation, “loss” is actually more motivating; and 3) people’s erroneous beliefs are partially due to habitual attention bias.
Citation:
Xianchi Dai, Muyu Wei, and Ann McGill (2011) ,"Is “Gain” More Motivating Than “Loss” in Competition?", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9, eds. Zhihong Yi, Jing Jian Xiao, and June Cotte and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 165-165.
Authors
Xianchi Dai, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Muyu Wei, Lingnan University
Ann McGill, University of Chicago, USA
Volume
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9 | 2011
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Pangs from Persuasion: When Recommendations Undermine Consumers’ Social Worth
Suzanne Galia Rath, Queens University, Canada
Laurence Ashworth, Queens University, Canada
Nicole Robitaille, Queens University, Canada
Featured
How Regional Diasporic Consumer Experiences Produce Transnational Imaginary
Mark Buschgens, RMIT University
Bernardo Figueiredo, RMIT University
Kaleel Rahman, RMIT University
Featured
L8. Recover the Unrecoverable: How Co-Recovery Shifts Consumers ‘Attribution Following a Failed Recovery
Bo Huang, HEC Montreal, Canada
Yany Grégoire, HEC Montreal, Canada
Matthew Philp, HEC Montreal, Canada