Invidious Comparisons: Multiple Sources of Unfairness in Comparisons to Prices Paid By Other Consumers
Comparisons to prices paid by other consumers have been identified as particularly meaningful in shaping price fairness judgments because they provide a salient, straightforward indication of the price consumers deserve (i.e., exactly the same as other consumers). In this research, we argue that consumers also interpret different prices as discriminatory and disrespectful, and that such inferences are an important source of the perceived unfairness. Three experiments were conducted manipulating both elements of the price comparison and consumer comparison characteristics.
Citation:
Laurence Ashworth and Lindsay McShane (2011) ,"Invidious Comparisons: Multiple Sources of Unfairness in Comparisons to Prices Paid By Other Consumers", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9, eds. Zhihong Yi, Jing Jian Xiao, and June Cotte and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 323-323.
Authors
Laurence Ashworth, Queen’s University, Canada
Lindsay McShane , Queen’s University, Canada
Volume
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9 | 2011
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
M9. Exploring Historical Nostalgia and its Relevance to Consumer Research
Matthew Farmer, University of Arizona, USA
Caleb Warren, University of Arizona, USA
Featured
Influence of Visual Crowding and Space Between Products on Consumer Choice
Ana Scekic, HEC Paris, France
Selin Atalay, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Germany
Cathy Liu Yang, HEC Paris, France
Peter Ebbes, HEC Paris, France
Featured
Changing the World, One Word at a Time: The Effect of Font Size on Prosocial Intention
Rima Touré-Tillery, Northwestern University, USA
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA