Does Ambivalence Always Lead to Discomfort? a Self-Regulatory Perspective
While attitudinal ambivalence is usually perceived as uncomfortable, the existing evidence is mixed. The present research aims to resolve this inconsistency by suggesting a self-regulatory perspective on ambivalence-induced discomfort. We hypothesize that the affective consequences of attitudinal ambivalence depend on how the activity of holding opposing evaluations about a single object is represented in relation to the goal being pursued. When it is represented as inhibitory to goal attainment, consumers will experience psychological discomfort due to the discrepancy between the ambivalent and the desired states. Otherwise, no discomfort will be induced. Two studies showed support for the self-regulatory perspective.
Citation:
Jun Pang and Hean Tat Keh (2011) ,"Does Ambivalence Always Lead to Discomfort? a Self-Regulatory Perspective", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9, eds. Zhihong Yi, Jing Jian Xiao, and June Cotte and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 51-52.
Authors
Jun Pang, Renmin University of China, P.R.China
Hean Tat Keh, Peking University, P.R.China
Volume
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9 | 2011
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Spreading of Alternatives Without a Perception of Choice
Kurt P. Munz, New York University, USA
Vicki G. Morwitz, New York University, USA
Featured
Using multi-methods in behavioral pricing research
Haipeng Chen, University of Kentucky, USA
David Hardesty, University of Kentucky, USA
Akshay Rao, University of Minnesota, USA
Lisa Bolton, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Featured
Faster than Fact: Consuming in Post-Truth Society
Robert Kozinets, University of Southern California, USA
Rossella Gambetti, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Silvia Biraghi, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart