“I Don’T” Versus “I Can’T”: Verbal Framing For Psychological Empowerment

The current research is based on the insight that the language we use to describe our choices either enhances or impedes our goal-directed behavior. Specifically, four experiments and a field study demonstrate that verbally framing a refusal as “I don’t” (vs. “I can’t”) increases feelings of empowerment and increases the likelihood of engaging in goal-directed behavior. The studies also demonstrate the mediating role of empowerment, as well as the influence of verbal framing on behavioral responses. Further, a boundary condition is demonstrated: the results are reversed when an external cause for the goal pursuit is made salient.



Citation:

Vanessa Patrick and Henrik Hagtvedt (2011) ,"“I Don’T” Versus “I Can’T”: Verbal Framing For Psychological Empowerment", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9, eds. Zhihong Yi, Jing Jian Xiao, and June Cotte and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 45-46.

Authors

Vanessa Patrick, University of Houston, USA
Henrik Hagtvedt, Boston College, USA



Volume

AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9 | 2011



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

M8. Nostalgia Increases Healthy Attitudes and Behaviors

Jannine Lasaleta, Yeshiva University
Carolina O. C. Werle, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Amanda Pruski Yamim, Grenoble Ecole de Management

Read More

Featured

Liminal Motherhood: Relational Partners Experience of Liminality

Adriana Schneider Dallolio, Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV-EAESP
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Read More

Featured

Individual-level Carryover-Parameters in Reference-Price Models

Ossama Elshiewy, University of Goettingen, Germany
Daniel Guhl, Humboldt-University Berlin

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.