“I Don’T” Versus “I Can’T”: Verbal Framing For Psychological Empowerment
The current research is based on the insight that the language we use to describe our choices either enhances or impedes our goal-directed behavior. Specifically, four experiments and a field study demonstrate that verbally framing a refusal as “I don’t” (vs. “I can’t”) increases feelings of empowerment and increases the likelihood of engaging in goal-directed behavior. The studies also demonstrate the mediating role of empowerment, as well as the influence of verbal framing on behavioral responses. Further, a boundary condition is demonstrated: the results are reversed when an external cause for the goal pursuit is made salient.
Citation:
Vanessa Patrick and Henrik Hagtvedt (2011) ,"“I Don’T” Versus “I Can’T”: Verbal Framing For Psychological Empowerment", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9, eds. Zhihong Yi, Jing Jian Xiao, and June Cotte and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 45-46.
Authors
Vanessa Patrick, University of Houston, USA
Henrik Hagtvedt, Boston College, USA
Volume
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9 | 2011
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
M8. Nostalgia Increases Healthy Attitudes and Behaviors
Jannine Lasaleta, Yeshiva University
Carolina O. C. Werle, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Amanda Pruski Yamim, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Featured
Liminal Motherhood: Relational Partners Experience of Liminality
Adriana Schneider Dallolio, Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV-EAESP
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Featured
Individual-level Carryover-Parameters in Reference-Price Models
Ossama Elshiewy, University of Goettingen, Germany
Daniel Guhl, Humboldt-University Berlin