The Role of Techniques of Neutralization in Using Double Standards

Despite the growing number of studies dealing with corporate and consumer ethics, empirical research about double standards remains scarce. The few studies dealing with this topic indicate that people rate corporate unethical actions as less admissible compared to similar consumer actions. However, little is known about the processes underlying the double standard concept. This research investigates whether the techniques of neutralization, indicated as having much potential explanatory power in the ethics area but, however, rarely investigated, could provide a meaningful way of approaching this phenomenon.


Tine De Bock and Patrick Van Kenhove (2011) ,"The Role of Techniques of Neutralization in Using Double Standards", in E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9, eds. Alan Bradshaw, Chris Hackley, and Pauline Maclaran, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 562.


Tine De Bock, Ghent University
Patrick Van Kenhove, Ghent University


E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 9 | 2011

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


A7. Credible Critters: Source and Message Expectancy Violation and Influence on Perceived Trustworthiness and Credibility

Justin Graeber, University of Texas at Austin, USA

Read More


Trust, but Verify: A Multi-level Examination of Online Reviews and Persuasion Knowledge

Martin A. Pyle, Ryerson University
Andrew Smith, Suffolk University
Yanina Chevtchouk, University of Glasgow

Read More


Brand Relationships in a "Post-Fact” World

Luciana Velloso, York University, Canada
Eileen Fischer, York University, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.