The Impact of Country of Manufacture and Brand on Consumers’ Attributions of Blame in a Product-Harm Crisis
Previous research on product-harm crises has examined how the characteristics of the observers of the crisis, such as gender or nationality, can influence blame attributions (see Laufer et al, 2005; Laufer and Gillespie, 2004; Laufer, 2002). This study enhances our understanding of the impact of product-harm crises on consumers by examining how situational factors impact consumer blame attributions. Three experiments were conducted involving three different product-harm crises to examine how two extrinsic cues, brand and country of manufacture, impact the assessment of blame by observers to a product-harm crisis where ambiguity is present.
Citation:
Daniel Laufer, Kate Gillespie, and David H. Silvera (2006) ,"The Impact of Country of Manufacture and Brand on Consumers’ Attributions of Blame in a Product-Harm Crisis", in LA - Latin American Advances in Consumer Research Volume 1, eds. Silvia Gonzalez and David Luna, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 187-187.
Authors
Daniel Laufer, Yeshiva University, USA
Kate Gillespie, University of Texas at Austin, USA
David H. Silvera, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA
Volume
LA - Latin American Advances in Consumer Research Volume 1 | 2006
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
Narrative Transportation and Cognitive Responses: The Other Side of the Story
Rebecca Krause, Northwestern University, USA
Derek Rucker, Northwestern University, USA
Featured
Ineffective Altruism: Giving Less When Donations Do More
Joshua Lewis, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Deborah Small, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Featured
G7. The Presence of Dividing Line Decrease Perceived Quantity
Jun Ouyang, Xiamen University
Yanli Jia, Xiamen University
Zhaoyang Guo, Xiamen University